What must a party do if they want to renew their right to change a judge after an appellate court ruling?

Study for the Arizona Family Law and Paralegal Certification Exam. Utilize flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complemented by hints and explanations for each question. Prepare confidently for your exam!

The timing for pursuing further relief after an appellate decision is tied to the issuance of the mandate. The mandate marks the formal conclusion of the appellate court’s action, and the court sets a strict window for seeking relief that would affect the judgment, such as a request related to changing the judge on the matter. In many jurisdictions, including practice in this area, that window is short—often 15 days after the mandate issues. Acting within this 15-day period preserves the right to seek the desired relief, while waiting longer generally forecloses it because the appellate court’s mandate closes the door on such motions. The other options don’t fit because they either refer to timing before the ruling, which cannot address post-decision relief, or propose a window based on the judge’s unavailability, which isn’t the triggering factor for these post-decision requests.