Which statement best describes the right to a change of judge?

Study for the Arizona Family Law and Paralegal Certification Exam. Utilize flashcards and multiple-choice questions, complemented by hints and explanations for each question. Prepare confidently for your exam!

In Arizona civil procedure, the protection of impartiality is built into the system so that every party has a right to have a case heard by a different judge if needed. This right applies to each party in any civil action, whether it’s a single case or a consolidated set of cases. The idea is that no party should be forced to proceed before a judge who might be biased or unable to be fair, and the change of judge should be available as a matter of course when a party seeks it.

So the statement that best describes the right to a change of judge is that each party is entitled as a matter of right to a change of judge in each action, whether single or consolidated. This reflects that the right is about ensuring fairness across the board, not something that hinges on the judge’s discretion or limited to only certain kinds of actions. It’s not limited to consolidated actions, and it isn’t purely discretionary or something that always requires separate court approval.